Evaluation of Conflict of Interest in Consulting Fee Payments in Plastic Surgery and Related Specialties.

BACKGROUND: The Physician Payments Sunshine Act was enacted to increase transparency regarding physician and industry financial interests. Consulting fee payments constitute a large proportion of these financial relationships. The authors hypothesized that there are discrepancies among industry-derived consulting payments to medical and surgical specialties. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the distribution of consulting fee payments to plastic surgery and related specialties. METHODS: This cross-sectional study used the publicly available Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Open Payments Program database for 2018. Consulting fee payments to physicians practicing in dermatology, internal medicine, neurosurgery, orthopedic surgery, otolaryngology, and plastic surgery were isolated and analyzed to identify discrepancies in consulting payments among these specialties and within plastic surgery. RESULTS: A total of $250,518,240 was paid in consulting fees to specialties analyzed, with the largest average payment made to orthopedic surgeons and neurosurgeons. Nearly half of physicians were paid at least $5000 for consulting fees in 2018. Most payments were not associated with contextual information. Among U.S. plastic surgeons, 4.2% held financial relationships with corporations and were likely to be paid more when consulting for small companies. CONCLUSIONS: Consulting payments make up a large proportion of payments included in the Open Payments Database. Although sex, state, company type, and sole proprietorship did not correlate with higher pay, plastic surgeons who consulted for small companies were paid more per payment than those working for large companies. Future studies are warranted to determine whether these industry financial relationships impact physician behavior.

A Guide to Industry Payments and an Algorithm for Their Management.

BACKGROUND: The Open Payments database was created to increase transparency of industry payment relationships within medicine. The current literature often examines only 1 year of the database. In this study, the authors use 5 years of data to show trends among industry payments to plastic surgeons from 2014 to 2018. In addition, the authors lay out the basics of conflict-of-interest reporting for the new plastic surgeon. Finally, the authors suggest an algorithm for the responsible management of industry relationships. METHODS: This study analyzed nonresearch payments made to plastic surgeons from January 1, 2014, to December 31, 2018. Descriptive statistics were calculated using R Statistical Software and visualized using Tableau. RESULTS: A total of 304,663 payments totaling $140,889,747 were made to 8148 plastic surgeons; 41 percent ($58.28 million) was paid to 50 plastic surgeons in the form of royalty or license payments. With royalties excluded, average and median payments were $276 and $25. The average yearly total per physician was $2028. Of the 14 payment categories, 95 percent of the total amount paid was attributable payments in one of six categories. Seven hundred thirty companies reported payments to plastic surgeons from 2014 to 2018; 15 companies (2 percent) were responsible for 80 percent ($66.34 million) of the total sum paid. Allergan was responsible for $24.45 million (29.6 percent) of this amount. CONCLUSIONS: Although discussions on the proper management of industry relationships continue to evolve, the data in this study illustrate the importance of managing industry relationships. The simple guidelines suggested create a basis for managing industry relationships in the career of the everyday plastic surgeon.

Evaluating the Effects of Enhanced Recovery Pathways in Craniosynostosis: National Trends in Hospitalization Charges and Length of Stay in Craniosynostosis Surgery.

BACKGROUND: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) pathways are multimodal approaches aimed at minimizing postoperative surgical stress, reducing hospitalization time, and lowering hospitalization charges. Enhanced Recovery After Surgery is broadly and increasingly implemented in hospitals across the country. Early reports have shown ERAS to reduce length of stay (LOS) after commonly performed pediatric surgeries. However, LOS and hospital charges after craniosynostosis have not been studied. We hypothesized that extended hospital LOS is correlated with increased hospitalization charges associated with open cranial vault surgery (CVS) and that over a multiyear timeframe, LOS and cost would decrease because of the increased adoption of ERAS in pediatric surgery. METHODS: The Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project's National Inpatient Sample database was analyzed from January 2007 to December 2014. All patients who were diagnosed with craniosynostosis who underwent CVS were included. Variables of interest included demographic data, hospital characteristics, hospitalization data, and total hospital charges. Univariate and generalized linear regression models were used to examine associations between selected variables and the hospitalization charges. RESULTS: There were 54,583 patients diagnosed with craniosynostosis between 2007 and 2014. Of these patients, 22,916 (41.9%) received CVS. The median total hospital charge was $66,605.77 (interquartile range, $44,095.60-$101,071.17). The median LOS was 3 days (interquartile range, 2-4 days), and there was no significant change in LOS by year (P = 0.979). However, despite a stable LOS, mean hospitalization charge increased significantly by year (P < 0.01). Regression analysis demonstrated the proportion of eligible patients who underwent CVS substantially increased over the selected timeframe (P < 0.01). Most procedures were performed in urban teaching hospitals and high-volume hospitals. There was no significant association between hospital volume and hospitalization charge (P = 0.331). CONCLUSIONS: Increasing hospital charges despite constant LOS for craniosynostosis CVS procedures was observed between 2007 and 2014. Although ERAS has reduced LOS for common pediatric surgical procedures, no decrease in LOS for CVS has been observed. The charges significantly increased over the same period including high-volume centers. Further study to safely lower LOS and hospitalization charges for this procedure may reduce the overall health care burden.

National Trends in Hospitalization Charges for Autologous Free Flap Breast Reconstruction.

BACKGROUND: There is significant cost variation among patients undergoing autologous free flap breast reconstruction. Previous studies hypothesize that factors like length of stay and hospital volume are key drivers of cost; however, how these factors have affected cost have not been well studied. Our study analyzes the factors influencing hospital charges relating to these procedures and their trends over a multiyear time frame. METHODS: The Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project's National Inpatient Sample database was analyzed from January 2009 to December 2014. All female patients who were diagnosed with breast cancer or at a high risk for breast cancer who underwent autologous free flap breast reconstruction were included. Variables of interest included demographic data, hospital characteristics, hospitalization data, and total hospital charges. Univariate and generalized linear models were used to examine associations between selected variables and the hospitalization charges, as well as trends in these factors over the years included. RESULTS: There were 659,220 female patients diagnosed with breast cancer or had a high risk of breast cancer between 2009 and 2014. Of these patients, 20,050 (3.0%) received autologous free flap breast reconstruction and were included. The mean total hospital charge was US $98,839.33 (SD = US $61,532.04). Regression analysis showed that the proportion of procedures to the total population of potential patients significantly increased over the selected time frame (P = 0.02). The average total charges also increased significantly (P < 0.01), despite a decrease in length of stay (P = 0.05). Procedures performed in the west were associated with significantly higher charges when compared with other regions (US $147,855.42, P < 0.001). Higher hospital charges were also associated with urban hospitals, regardless of teaching status. CONCLUSIONS: The overall demand for the autologous free flap breast reconstruction is increasing within the patient population, in conjunction with increasing associated hospital charges. This increase in cost is seen despite an overall decrease in length of stay, originally thought to be the main contributor to regional cost variation. Further studies should be done to develop strategies to better target increased hospitalization charges, because the overall health care burden of this procedure is expected to rise if current trends continue.

Outcomes and Predictors of Revision Labiaplasty and Clitoroplasty after Gender-Affirming Genital Surgery.

BACKGROUND: Penile inversion vaginoplasty is the most common gender-affirming procedure for transfeminine patients. Patients undergoing this procedure may require revision labiaplasty and clitoroplasty. This study describes complications and outcomes from the largest reported cohort in the United States to undergo penile inversion vaginoplasty with subsequent revision labiaplasty and/or clitoroplasty. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was performed of a single surgeon's experience with penile inversion vaginoplasty with or without revision labiaplasty and/or clitoroplasty between July of 2014 and June of 2016 in a cohort of gender-diverse patients assigned male at birth. Patient demographic data, complications, and quality of life data were collected. Univariate and multivariate comparisons were completed. RESULTS: A total of 117 patients underwent penile inversion vaginoplasty. Of these, 28 patients (23.9 percent) underwent revision labiaplasty and/or clitoroplasty, with nine patients (7.7 percent) undergoing both procedures. Patients who underwent penile inversion vaginoplasty necessitating revision were significantly more likely to have granulation tissue (p = 0.006), intravaginal scarring (p < 0.001), and complete vaginal stenosis (p = 0.008). The majority of patients who underwent revision labiaplasty and/or clitoroplasty reported satisfaction with their final surgical outcome (82.4 percent) and resolution of their genital-related dysphoria (76.5 percent). CONCLUSIONS: Patients who developed minor postoperative complications following penile inversion vaginoplasty were more likely to require revision surgery to address functional and aesthetic concerns. Patients responded with high levels of satisfaction following revision procedures, with the majority of patients reporting resolution of genital-related dysphoria. Transfeminine patients who undergo penile inversion vaginoplasty should be counseled on the possibility of revisions during their postoperative course. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, III.